Skip to main content

Judas: A Lesson in Discipleship

Throughout The Cost of Discipleship, Bonhoeffer addresses what being a disciple of Jesus truly looks like. This discourse leads to the call to discipleship, for one cannot be a disciple unless they are called, and then briefly to the apostles. The apostles were called by Jesus, which includes Judas Iscariot. The fact that Jesus called Judas presents the question of why He would present the offer of discipleship to him since He would have known what the future held. Additionally, Judas blended right in with the rest of the apostles, none of them ever believing that any of the group would turn on Jesus. Judas’ calling holds many lessons for Christians regarding the nature of the call to discipleship, the people who are at church, and of one’s own calling.
Judas is a complex figure in the Bible, being called to discipleship but betraying his master. Bonhoeffer presents an assessment of Judas: “Even Judas went forth to Christ-work, and the fact that he did so will always be a dark riddle and an awful warning” (205). He calls Judas’ apostleship a dark riddle because he was called by Jesus, and since Jesus is all-knowing, he would have known that He would be betrayed by him. To fully understand, one needs to know the process of discipleship. Bonhoeffer writes that “there is no road to faith or discipleship, no other road--only obedience to the call of Jesus” (58). Since obeying the call means following Jesus, this step implies that Judas willingly chose to follow Jesus, that at one point he willingly chose to be a disciple. He then says, “Only the Mediator, the God-Man, can call men to follow him” (59). One does not just decide to follow Jesus--he must be called by God, and there is no other way. Furthermore, Judas had to believe that Jesus was the Christ, for “only he who believes is obedient, and only he who is obedient believes” (63). Bonhoeffer writes that “[w]hen Jesus called his first disciples, they obeyed and followed him because they recognized him as the Christ … and he can be recognized only by faith” (226). Judas is one of the first disciples, meaning he would have recognized Jesus. In order for him to follow, he had to believe, and his obedience shows that to be true. Furthermore, the call shows that Jesus wanted Judas to follow Him. Even though people turn away from God and constantly sin, He still pursues them and wants to bring them back to Him. Jesus saw all of Judas’ flaws and would have known the horrible act he would execute, but He still chose to call him. Judas is a dark riddle because, even though the betrayal of Jesus was in his future, he was still summoned to discipleship by Jesus, which he accepted.
 Judas also serves as a warning for Christians not to be fooled by appearances. There have been many people who claimed to follow Christ but were actually leading others astray. Judas looked like an apostle, but inside he was plotting to hand Jesus over to the Pharisees. None of the other apostles knew what he was planning. Bonhoeffer discusses how not everyone who attends church is who he says he is. He writes about false prophets, saying, “He looks like a Christian, he talks and acts like one. But dark powers are mysteriously at work … his words are lies and his works are full of deceit” (191). People may appear to be good church members, but they are actually working for the enemy trying to lead people away from the truth. Since people can be fooled, they can also fall away. Bonhoeffer further writes that “[t]he path of discipleship is narrow, and it is fatally easy to miss one’s way and stray from the path, even after years of discipleship” (190). Even the most devout followers of God can fall off the narrow way. Judas responded to Jesus’ call, which means he had some devotion. This scenario explains what happened with Judas, for he had nothing material to gain from following Jesus, so there could not have been an economic motivation; the only area he had to gain in was eternal life and the satisfaction of following Jesus. In scripture, his temptation was greed, like in John 12:1-8, when he desires the money that could have been earned by selling the perfume used to anoint Jesus’ feet. When Judas saw the opportunity to make money by betraying Jesus, he fell away by taking it, which let evil in, for his greed outweighed his devotion to God. Therefore, his story demonstrates how one could follow the right path and end up falling away. Judas proves to be a warning not only against false Christians but the ability to fall away, too.
Judas can also serve as a warning for becoming involved in evil. He made a deal with the Jewish leaders in Matthew 26:14-16 to have Jesus arrested in turn for money, not knowing the full extent of their plans. When Judas finds out Jesus has been crucified, he is mortified and tries to give back the coins before killing himself. The author writes, “The Body of Christ is the living temple of God and of the new humanity” (247). Christians receive new selves which are dwelling places for God, and so they should not be participating in acts contrary to the new identity they have taken. Judas thought one situation would happen, but instead another did. The message is that, by involving oneself in evil, it might actually go farther than intended, having dire consequences. Becoming involved in an area where one should not never ends well. Members of the body of Christ should strive to follow Him, but partaking in evil is acting to the contrary.
Bonhoeffer mentions Judas Iscariot when he discusses the apostles, claiming him to be a riddle and a caution. The reason he makes that statement is because Judas presents a riddle as to why a future betrayer would be called in the first place, which ties into the calling to be a disciple. He had to have belief in order to follow Christ, showing that at one point in time he wished to be a disciple. The warning is because if Judas, one of the original disciples, could fall off the narrow path by engaging in activities contrary to those commanded by God, then that outcome is possible for devout Christians. He also serves as a caution against taking people at face value, for one never knows when a deceiver is in his midst.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Contract Course: Newton and Leibniz: Influenced and Influencing

People influence others, either for the better or for the worse. This fact is clearly seen in the priority dispute between Isaac Newton, an English mathematician and scientist, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a German mathematician and lawyer, over the invention of fluxions, or differential calculus, calculus concerned with derivatives and differentials, as a result of both releasing their findings around the same time. Claiming priority was important because the person received the recognition for their accomplishment, thereby showing that anyone else that published similar theories was most likely copying. Newton and Leibniz had multiple areas of influence, including other mathematicians, journals, or colleagues. The men would not have gotten to the point they were at in their knowledge and careers if it were not for multiple parties. The priority dispute over calculus was heavily influenced by the people who supported or criticized Newton and Leibniz, whether in the early or later st...

A Continuation of the Great Conversation

Reading. Discussion. Two things the Great Books program revolves around. Without them, Great Books wouldn't be the same and likely wouldn't exist. As I was reading The Screwtape Letters , I began noticing connections between the content and the program (and, to some extent, my thesis). The great conversation doesn't stop upon graduation, it flows throughout our entire lives. The form may change but it still continues; it's no longer sitting in a classroom discussion but instead finding connections in our daily lives, often between literature and life. Lewis discusses various ways that we can be led into sin and away from God in The Screwtape Letters . Many of the issues he mentions are still highly prevalent today. In one letter, Screwtape tells Wormwood about the progress they've made in disassociating the past from the present, mainly in terms of reading. By convincing modern readers to focus on anything but the truth behind a book, they've caused humanity to ...

Progress: Progressing Away From Humanity

Technology is often proclaimed in society as wonderful, that it is progressing mankind to places undreamt of, that all will be better after progress is achieved. Societies try to acquire the newest technology in order to move forward into their vision for the future, typically a world where problems and disease are either gone or simplified and where humans can have easier lives. This advancement, in part, is rooted in scientific discovery and innovation. Progress claims to be able to accomplish more with technological improvements, probe the mysteries of the universe, and attain more knowledge, but better understanding does not guarantee the creation of a better world. Scientific progress, especially as it pertains to technology, is not moving humanity in a better direction, but instead is causing it to move away from what is good; it is not progressing humanity toward anything but the destruction of its nature.  Progress is seen as a path toward the improvement of humanity and th...