Skip to main content

A Continuation of the Great Conversation

Reading. Discussion. Two things the Great Books program revolves around. Without them, Great Books wouldn't be the same and likely wouldn't exist. As I was reading The Screwtape Letters, I began noticing connections between the content and the program (and, to some extent, my thesis). The great conversation doesn't stop upon graduation, it flows throughout our entire lives. The form may change but it still continues; it's no longer sitting in a classroom discussion but instead finding connections in our daily lives, often between literature and life.

Lewis discusses various ways that we can be led into sin and away from God in The Screwtape Letters. Many of the issues he mentions are still highly prevalent today. In one letter, Screwtape tells Wormwood about the progress they've made in disassociating the past from the present, mainly in terms of reading. By convincing modern readers to focus on anything but the truth behind a book, they've caused humanity to lose much focus on it. Instead, discussion shifts to points of view, the history surrounding the work, influences, etc. All of these topics are helpful for understanding the meaning behind the larger work, but if we simply discuss what the author means or believe that it was only useful ages ago and fail to discuss if it is right and true, then we have failed in our duty as readers and, ultimately, as Christians. As Christians, we are told to test the spirits to see if they are from God. We should give the same weight to what we read so as not to be lead astray by written false teachings. That's where Great Books excels. We take the time in class to interpret what the author is saying, but we have discussions about the truthfulness. Do we agree that the monks in Desert Fathers are living out their faith in accordance with Scripture? Why is Aristotle's golden mean true, even centuries later? Of course, the pursuit of truth shouldn't start and stop with discussion. If one fails to apply it to his life, then he's not much better off from when he didn't know. Knowledge lets us change our mindsets, habits, and lifestyle to align with the good and true. For example, we can't just read about virtue, we have to be virtuous. And that's why studying classics is so important; it reveals to us greater truths about the world while providing us with a deeper understanding that we can then use to make change.

"Don't stand out by reading old books--fit in. Read the new ones, or don't read at all, as that would be better that separating oneself from the crowd," Screwtape would say. Reading older books is frowned upon as weird, at the least. Yet by not reading the classics, we separate ourselves from truth and, potentially, from God (as many of these books focus on Him) which is exactly what the enemy wants. In our modern area, these types of books are typically read in certain classroom settings, such as college honors programs. In certain academic circles, there is pushback against such programs, with people viewing them as elitist or unnecessary. After reading Screwtape Proposes a Toast, this disdain made more sense. Screwtape talks about how spreading democracy, the kind where everyone thinks the rest of humanity should look the same and no one stand out, can lead to holding those intellectually gifted minds back so as not to offend anyone. When students are held back, education is dummied down. Honors programs are, in a way, a pushback against this. When environments are provided for people to pursue higher places of learning where they can further their intellect, it should be welcomed because they are letting students reach their full potential instead of limiting them to a typical classroom setup. I think that's especially true with Great Books since participation requires a greater level of thinking and interpreting than an entry level class that simply requires memorization.

That's why Great Books is invaluable. No, one doesn't have to read old books and discuss them in a classroom in order to have understanding. However, the fact that the program easily enables students to have those edifying experiences whilst steering them in pursuit of God is beautiful. So continue reading great books in order to learn and grow, and don't listen to the world when it pushes against it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creative Essay: Atalanta

Just what I wanted. A girl. They serve no purpose and a boy would have been so much better. Girls do not rule kingdoms. But no, I, King Schoeneus, was not fortunate enough to have an heir. A frown forms on my face as I look down at the child. The slaves are trustworthy enough, but not for this task, so I take it upon myself to perform the deed. I take the infant up in my arms and to a hill on the outskirts of the palace near the forest and throw her off. Do I feel remorse at tossing my child out into the elements like this? No, and in fact I soon forget that the female was even born. Years pass and I still have no son sired to me. Who is supposed to take over the throne when I am gone? Offerings are made to the gods multiple times and still they do not bless my family. There is only one action left that I know to take: Visit the Oracle. The journey will be hard but I need to know if there is any hope. I take two servants and provisions with me. I have already prayed for protection b...

Refusing to Escape Justice

In Plato’s " Crito" , we meet Socrates who is in prison. His friend, Crito, proposes placing a bribe to help him escape, but Socrates refuses and proceeds to explain why he did so. While Plato was explaining the reasoning for Socrates staying in prison, I believe there is also a larger picture, one where he is attempting to convince the populace against placing bribes to help convicts flee. Plato was addressing those who have helped prisoners escape and the escapees by trying to convey the message of why running away and aiding runaways is not right. Crito says “Look here, Socrates, it is still not too late to take my advice and escape… a great many people who don’t know you and me very well will be sure to think that I let you down, because I could have saved you if I had been willing to spend the money” (56). From the way he explains his reasoning, it sounds like bribing people to help them out of prison was a common practice. It would make perfect sense then for Crito t...

Thoughts of a Penguin

When did it become common to use the word like multiple times in a sentence? Why is it done? Is it because we do not want to say exactly what we mean in case we are wrong, and, therefore, would rather use “like” instead of sounding correct, or is it simply a filler word? I f it is the latter, we should know what we will say before we speak instead of filling time with useless chatter. While recognizing our wretchedness is good because it means acknowledging our nature, dwelling on it too much is not beneficial because it could lead to feeling miserable, and no one needs to feel miserable on top of our present state. Our present world has enough misery. Seeing that humanity is fallen is not hard. For instance, there are the poor drivers or people who get involved in argument after argument. When I consider all that I see in one day, it is tempting to say “I am so done with humanity,” because truth be told, it is draining trying to live right and follow the rules when everywhere...