Skip to main content

Calling People Out

During Folly’s speech in In Praise of Folly, she begins to talk about the different church positions, one of which are priests. She brings up how they work misdeeds into their sermons when stirred up, and how no one understands who they are referring to. Erasmus, through Folly, is pointing out that when people get caught up in trying to catch the culprit, they can fail to understand that it is themself, as well as the error of the priests in committing this act.
Erasmus writes that, “But if anyone should anger these wasps, they’ll sufficiently revenge themselves in their public sermons and so point out their enemy by circumlocutions that there’s no one but understands whom ‘tis they mean, unless they understand nothing at all” (50).  Priests are the ones who listen to others confess their sins and then go to God on behalf of them. Their job means they have dirt on dozens of people. If a person does something that makes them angry or slanders one of them, they then have loads of information at their disposal that they can use how they please. They want to get back at whoever has made them look shameful, and they feel pleased knowing they can in front of the whole church body. However, their methods are not direct. They use the sins the person has confessed, work them into a sermon, and then proceed to throw shade. Meanwhile, others try and figure out who the priest is talking about, oblivious to the fact that they could be the ones under attack. They fail to understand whom the priest meant, meaning they really understand nothing because they are not aware of the possible truth.
After describing how the priests use confessions to their advantage, Erasmus continues by saying “nor will they give over their barking till you throw the dogs a bone” (50). The dogs are the priests, and the barking implies how they have been pointing people out in their sermons. He means that the preachers will not stop their haggling until they know that the person they were after is well aware of their fault and feels guilty, meaning that they will then have their revenge. Their speech makes them seem like fools, for they are more concerned with throwing people under the bus and sounding elegant rather than actually teaching the word of God. The behavior by which they represent religion is full of “vileness, ignorance, rudeness, and imprudence,” which is no way for leaders of the church to act (49). Additionally, they also see nothing wrong with their actions, believing that they are pleasing God. The people should not have to run around worrying if their sins would be the next on display after they confessed because the priests should care enough for their spirituality to not use them in such a way. The latter group needed to realize they were not so high and mighty.  Erasmus wants to show how they should not take up time by trying to get revenge, but should be more concerned with the well-being of the people and realize that, even though they may be in a position of power, calling someone out in such a manner is unbecoming of their place.
Erasmus is showing how we are quick to point fingers at others, but then do not realize that we could be guilty of the exact same sin. If someone did believe the priest was speaking against them, then that proved their guiltiness, not the fact that they were a target. He was getting at the point that people did need to take the time to examine themselves, but also realize that whenever the priest brought up something, it did not apply to every person in the room. Sometimes we are so busy examining others that we do not realize it applies to us. Further, as much as the words are a message for the congregation, they had meaning for the preachers as well. Words have much power, and so they should be used with discretion and not as a way to elevate oneself.
Erasmus contains many lessons in his work and calls many people and groups out, one of which is the church leaders who do not use their position like they ought. The church members should not be quick to find fault with others when they can have the same sin in their own lives, while the priests should not use their position to harm others and should only seek to use it to benefit others, not themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Continuation of the Great Conversation

Reading. Discussion. Two things the Great Books program revolves around. Without them, Great Books wouldn't be the same and likely wouldn't exist. As I was reading The Screwtape Letters , I began noticing connections between the content and the program (and, to some extent, my thesis). The great conversation doesn't stop upon graduation, it flows throughout our entire lives. The form may change but it still continues; it's no longer sitting in a classroom discussion but instead finding connections in our daily lives, often between literature and life. Lewis discusses various ways that we can be led into sin and away from God in The Screwtape Letters . Many of the issues he mentions are still highly prevalent today. In one letter, Screwtape tells Wormwood about the progress they've made in disassociating the past from the present, mainly in terms of reading. By convincing modern readers to focus on anything but the truth behind a book, they've caused humanity to ...

Contract Course: Newton and Leibniz: Influenced and Influencing

People influence others, either for the better or for the worse. This fact is clearly seen in the priority dispute between Isaac Newton, an English mathematician and scientist, and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a German mathematician and lawyer, over the invention of fluxions, or differential calculus, calculus concerned with derivatives and differentials, as a result of both releasing their findings around the same time. Claiming priority was important because the person received the recognition for their accomplishment, thereby showing that anyone else that published similar theories was most likely copying. Newton and Leibniz had multiple areas of influence, including other mathematicians, journals, or colleagues. The men would not have gotten to the point they were at in their knowledge and careers if it were not for multiple parties. The priority dispute over calculus was heavily influenced by the people who supported or criticized Newton and Leibniz, whether in the early or later st...

An Introduction

Hi! Welcome to my blog. To start I'm going to give the inspiration behind my blog name (because why not). I love penguins, sometimes even calling myself one, so that is where the first half comes from. With a book is because I love to read. If I had it my way that would be one of the only things I would do. (I want a job where I can do just that.) I have a fluffy, lazy, white cat names Snowball. Emphasis on fluffy and lazy. I enjoy acting if there is an opportunity. I really want to travel to Italy, one of the reasons being because of all the history there. The purpose for this blog is for the Great Books program at Faulkner University and to share work and thoughts related to the course. If you come away from here with a new idea, that's great! It will be interesting other's thoughts.